Judicial Guardianship in Marriage: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Shāfiʿī and Iran’s Jaʿfarī Schools from a Maqāsid alSharīʿah Perspective

Stiawan, Thoat and Al Farisi, Salman and Sidqi, Hisam and Laksamana, Agil (2025) Judicial Guardianship in Marriage: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Shāfiʿī and Iran’s Jaʿfarī Schools from a Maqāsid alSharīʿah Perspective. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 12 (2). pp. 396-413. ISSN 2356-1637

[thumbnail of 12304-Article Text-42353-1-10-20250903.pdf]
Preview
Text
12304-Article Text-42353-1-10-20250903.pdf

Download (565kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Judicial Guardianship in Marriage_ A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Shāfiʿī and Iran’s Jaʿfarī Schools from a Maqāsid al Sharīʿah Perspective.pdf]
Preview
Text
Judicial Guardianship in Marriage_ A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Shāfiʿī and Iran’s Jaʿfarī Schools from a Maqāsid al Sharīʿah Perspective.pdf

Download (957kB) | Preview

Abstract

The concept of judicial guardianship in marriage is a significant issue in Islamic family law that highlights the fundamental differences between the Shāfiʿī school in Indonesia and the Jaʿfarī school in Iran. This distinction is not only juridical but also closely linked to the objectives of marriage (maqāsid al-nikāh), namely the preservation of religion (hifz al-dīn), lineage (hifz al-nasl), dignity (hifz al-ʿird), and family welfare. This study employs a qualitative-juridical approach with normative comparative analysis. Data were drawn from classical fiqh texts, Indonesian and Iranian marriage regulations, and contemporary literature. The analysis proceeded in three stages: (1) identifying normative texts concerning guardianship and judicial guardianship in the Shāfiʿī and Jaʿfarī traditions, (2) comparing their conceptual and practical applications, and (3) evaluating their alignment with maqāṣid
al-nikāḥ, particularly in promoting benefits, preventing harm (mafsadah), and ensuring family
continuity. The findings show that the Shāfiʿī school regards the guardian as a prerequisite
for valid marriage, with the judicial guardian acting as a substitute when a lineage guardian
is absent or unqualified. By contrast, the Jaʿfarī school allows adult women to contract
marriage without a guardian, except under specific circumstances. These differences reflect
the dynamic nature of Islamic legal thought in responding to social realities, yet both
approaches ultimately aim to realize the maqāṣid al-nikāḥ: legal certainty, protection of
dignity, and household stability. The novelty of this research lies in integrating cross
sectarian comparative analysis with the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, an approach still
rarely applied in studies of Islamic family law, particularly in the Indonesian and Iranian
contexts. The implications of this research are twofold: enriching comparative fiqh
scholarship as a reference for academic discourse and providing practical insights for the
formulation of marriage regulations that remain faithful to sharīʿah while responsive to
evolving social dynamics.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Divisions: Jurnal > Fakultas Agama Islam
Depositing User: THO'AT STIAWAN STIAWAN
Date Deposited: 10 Sep 2025 06:57
Last Modified: 10 Sep 2025 06:57
URI: https://repository.um-surabaya.ac.id/id/eprint/10412

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item